[LNM: In honor of Hanukkah here are some chocolate gold coins from The Candyman. (Mesh bag not included.)]
Hi all, Candyman here again, saying "Put on your yarmulke, it's time for Hannuka!" Y'know, Adam Sandler did a lot for Jewish pride when he came up with that silly song.
This week, I thought of a book that hasn't entered my head in years: Patterns in Time: Chanuka, by Matis Weinberg. I was a young and impressionable young man when I read it, my first year in yeshiva, but I remember thinking that book was genius. I stayed up all night reading it. I'd probaby be more critical of it today. Still, Weinberg is very creative, with a focus on p'shat (plain meaning), and it's worth checking out if you have the chance.
A couple of years ago, a friend informed me that Weinberg, once touted as a rising gadol (giant), had been accused of making sexual advances towards the young men at his yeshiva in Israel. I was very saddened to hear that. It's a huge shame, and a story that is becoming way too common. When it comes to the child molesters, some rabbis seem more interested in saving face than protecting children. In any case, Weinberg's book is still worth checking out. We all have challenges... they are written into our DNA. Sometimes we pass the tests, and sometimes we fail. But ideas should never be judged on where they come from. The rabbis of old got this right (Mishna Avot 5:27): Look not at the jug, but what it contains. There are new jugs full of old wine, and old jugs that contain even no wine at all.
Wow. I've got to say that writing that depressed me a bit. So let's say something short and nice about Hannuka. You are probably familiar with the miracle of the oil. When the Jewish Maccabees reclaimed the Temple from the Greeks, there was only one bottle of oil left, enough to light the menorah (lamp) for only one day. Amazingly, this little bottle lasted a full eight days! The miracle is famous enough. But what is the source text for this miracle?
You may be surprised to learn that the miracle of the oil does not appear at all in the earliest Jewish texts about Hannuka, which are the Apocryphal books I and II Maccabees (~100 B.C.) and the later text "Megillat Antiochus" (~200 C.E., reprinted with translation in the back of the Birnbaum Siddur/prayerbook... whose translations are excellent and worth checking out, especially if you are finding yourself bored during davening/prayer). In fact, the earliest source for the miracle of the oil appears to be the Talmud (B.T. Shabbat 21b), which as we know was finalized sometime around 700 C.E. However, as Wikipedia points out, there is a somewhat reminiscent story brought down in II Maccabees 1:18-36 about a fire in Nehemia's days. (Many of these points have already been made in the comments on the post earlier this week about Hannuka. Good job, people.)
Talk of apocrypha reminds me of a time about ten years ago, when I first ventured forth from the walls of the yeshiva to a local university library. At the time, I was searching for answers to questions which my Bible and Talmud study had raised in my mind. Who wrote the Bible? When and how did the "Oral Torah" develop? Needless to say, my yeshiva education had not provided me with the answers. At the library, I chanced upon a book by the late Jewish historian Hyam Maccoby, called Early Rabbinic Writings. It was a collection of mostly Pharisaic texts, most of which never made it into the Mishna. The book, which is very good and easy to read, is part of a wonderful series called the Cambridge Commentaries on Writings of the Jewish and Christian World. Each volume in the series is a sampler of primary sources from different eras or groups, e.g. Apocrypha, Pseudoepigrapha, Rabbinics, Qumran sect, etc. There are so many ancient texts out there that, sadly, neither yeshiva students nor rabbis are familiar with today. If you are looking for answers, they are a good place to start.
10 comments:
Are you really an atheist. Being part of the modern world and understanding science and chemistry the way I do, is it really possible to be an atheist? Have you seen the planet earth video? ( 12 years in the making and shots of nature never before seen by man ) I look at it and I say I cant believe that this came about only through evolution, there had to be some guiding force. And then my reality driven mind steps in and says, nah there cant be any God. I am a man torn between reason and logic. You know my wife may be right. Dont ask any questions, just do what you are told ( by the Godamn fool rebbeim ) Avi
Dawkins says: "It is grindingly, creakingly, obvious that, if Darwinism were really a theory of chance, it couldn't work."
But that would mean natural selection should be a force. There are only 4 forces. Natural Selection ain't one of them. Dawkins is worrying for nothing. The fittest survive. Who are the fittest? Those who died with more offspring. Haven't you ever read about people who have died with more children than others?
The apocrypha are truly interesting, and give an insight into what life was really like during the second temple era, from the perspective of the Judean community. (For the most part life was pretty awful, with incessant wars, political assasinations, poverty, disease, etc).
Chadesh Yameinu Kekedem... it's pretty hard to actually mean this.
Avi: As you know, religion comes down to emotion-- the human need for meaning and purpose. Can we objectify love, or pain? The feelings are as real as anything physical. Yeshayahu Leibovitz famously said, when confronted with scientific evidence contradictory to tradition, "values have no rationale". Like if you decide to be a good person, or a liberal, or whatever. Can you justify it? No, it just a personal decision to adopt a set of values. So is Judaism, according to Leibovits. Very cold, but profound.
I agree with your internal struggle regarding the universe, and I prefer just not to think about it too much....
"We all have challenges... they are written into our DNA. Sometimes we pass the tests, and sometimes we fail. But ideas should never be judged on where they come from"
Great line. I used to learn with a Chaisdishe Rebbe, and he once threw out a out of character comment to the effect of that the tayva (lust) does not go away when you become a rebbe, it is actually there and even more so.
After looking at the R Matis stuff on the web, it looks like he is guilty of something. The problem is that we are always taught that a Torah giant is not only an intellectual status, it is a person who has midos,ruchniyos etc. And learning puts great emphasis on who said what, if someone chashuv said it or not. As opposed to divorcing the idea from the person.
I prefer not to comment on his being guilty or not until we really know. Trial by internet is not good.
Patterns In Time is simply the most brilliant book on Chanukah that I have ever had the pleasure of reading. I use it in almost every class that I give about the chaggim. Rabbi Weinberg has an unconventional, brilliant approach to understanding Jewish history. That book completely blew me away.
As far as R. Weinberg's guilt or innocence, I know someone who was his assistant in Yeshiva who says all the charges are bs and that it's a witchhunt. Fact is, we'll never know, but to accuse someone of something so horrible without solid proof is disgusting. Remember the day-care scandals of the nineties, where people's lives were completely ruined on completely false charges? I don't care if he's a Rabbi or not; let's just be careful who we condemn.
Of course his assistant will defend him. And will believe fully in his defense. That doesn't make him innocent. If someone unbiased who reviewed the matter came to the same conclusion then you would have something.
I used to think that he was such a genious, but his genious is more on the lines of spouting radical thoughts and convoluted connections and brilliant memory/recall. But all the 'straight thinkers' (those with "Seychel HaYashar") who have heard him or read his stuff have all come away saying that it is all bogus.
"Of course his assistant will defend him. And will believe fully in his defense. That doesn't make him innocent."
It doesn't make him guilty either. Besides that one is not his assistant anymore. Besides an assistant may very well open up to a friend.
"If someone unbiased who reviewed the matter came to the same conclusion then you would have something."
Irrelevant. Unless we know the details talking about credibility to lend support to a charge is worthless.
Ah for the good old days in the Soviet Union where you didnt even need to be accused of anything to find yourself going to the Gulag. Now in America alleged anything it seems is enough to destroy a persons life without so much as a trial.
THe McMartin School owners and teachers were destroyed by a bunch of lies and half baked attorney doublespeak. The awareness center is of that lynch mob mentality that crucified Raymond Buckey his Sister and Mother, but they get to hide behind a veneer of anonymity while many of the accused are tainted with just a finger point.
It amazes me with all the "education" that the general public has on this issue of Rav Matis not once do i ever see a reference to the words of chazal:
1) by a talmid chacham the rules of he'vei dan l'kaf zechut even apply in situations that seem to be machria l'kaf chova, how much more so in this case where besides for the awareness center (founded by a woman who was interviewed on Oprah alleging that her jewish family engaged in satanic human sacrifice) we have little else that is concrete
2) אם ראית ת"ח שעבר עבירה בלילה אל תהרהר אחריו ביום כי בודאי עשה תשובה
Post a Comment