Friday, December 21, 2007

Dem bones, dem bones

[Let's hear again from our favorite guest blogger, the Candyman!-LNM]

This week's portion takes us to the end of Genesis, where the scene is rather bleak. The brothers have been driven out of Canaan, the promised land, from hunger, and find themselves in a foreign land. Their patriarch, Jacob (who describes his days as "full of hardship"), has recently passed away, and now Joseph, their protector, lies on his deathbed. It is against this backdrop that Joseph promises his brothers,
“And God will surely remember you, and raise you up from this land, to the land he has promised to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob… God will surely remember you, and you shall raise up my bones with you from here.” (v. 50:24-25)

וַיֹּאמֶר יוֹסֵף אֶל-אֶחָיו, אָנֹכִי מֵת; וֵאלֹהִים פָּקֹד יִפְקֹד אֶתְכֶם, וְהֶעֱלָה אֶתְכֶם מִן-הָאָרֶץ הַזֹּאת, אֶל-הָאָרֶץ, אֲשֶׁר נִשְׁבַּע לְאַבְרָהָם לְיִצְחָק וּלְיַעֲקֹב. וַיַּשְׁבַּע יוֹסֵף, אֶת-בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל לֵאמֹר: פָּקֹד יִפְקֹד אֱלֹהִים אֶתְכֶם, וְהַעֲלִתֶם אֶת-עַצְמֹתַי מִזֶּה
This symbol—Joseph's coffin rising from its grave—resembles resurrection, as does Joseph's rising from the pit during his lifetime (see last week's post). What's even more interesting is that Joseph juxtaposes the image of the Israelites "rising" (Hebrew ELH) from Egypt and his own bones rising. Joseph seems to be suggesting that his bones, his symbolic resurrections, are linked with Israel's redemption from exile.

You can't understand the chumash/Pentateuch without understanding the later Prophets (i.e. the prophets that aren't taught in schools because 'they are too hard'). The image of bones and resurrection is reminiscent of a passage in Ezekiel (37:1-14). There, resurrection is used in the context of a very different national crisis, the destruction of the first Temple and the exile of the Israelites to Babylonia. Ezekiel watches in disbelief as a heap of dry human bones wears anew sinews and flesh, returning to life. The image, God explains, is symbolic (v. 11-12):
"And He said to me: Son of man, these bones are all of the house of Israel; behold, they say, “Our bones have dried up, and our hope is lost, and we are doomed.” Therefore, prophesy to them, saying, “So says my Lord, God: Behold, I am opening your graves, and I shall bring you up from your graves, My nation; and I shall bring you to the land of Israel…"

ְ וַיֹּאמֶר, אֵלַי, בֶּן-אָדָם, הָעֲצָמוֹת הָאֵלֶּה כָּל-בֵּית יִשְׂרָאֵל הֵמָּה; הִנֵּה אֹמְרִים, יָבְשׁוּ עַצְמוֹתֵינוּ וְאָבְדָה תִקְוָתֵנוּ--נִגְזַרְנוּ לָנוּ. לָכֵן הִנָּבֵא וְאָמַרְתָּ אֲלֵיהֶם, כֹּה-אָמַר אֲדֹנָי יְהוִה, הִנֵּה אֲנִי פֹתֵחַ אֶת-קִבְרוֹתֵיכֶם וְהַעֲלֵיתִי אֶתְכֶם מִקִּבְרוֹתֵיכֶם, עַמִּי; וְהֵבֵאתִי אֶתְכֶם, אֶל-אַדְמַת יִשְׂרָאֵל
The symbolism here is strikingly similar to that of the Joseph narrative. Like Joseph’s bones, the dried bones in Ezekiel’s vision are a symbol of hope for a nation recently exiled. In both cases, the bones are linked to a return to the homeland of Israel. In the Ezekiel story, though, the symbol of bones has an added significance. Bones are used to relay Ezekiel's vision of hope precisely because they are a symbol of hopelessness—the Israelites say, metaphorically, "Our bones have dried up, and our hope is lost." This was particularly appropriate for the generation of the Babylonian exile, whose faithlessness is a running theme for the prophets of the exile.

The similarities between the Joseph narrative and Ezekiel's vision suggest that the Joseph narrative was written with not only the Egyptian, but also the Babylonian exile in mind. Reading the story of Joseph, an exile in Ezekiel’s day might well identify with the message of hope and redemption embodied in Joseph’s bones. For such an individual, the entire redemption from Egypt would be a symbol for a promised redemption from Babylon. The Joseph story seems conveniently appropriate for this audience.

Furthermore, a second exile/descent to Egypt occurred shortly after the Babylonian conquest. What happened was that the remaining Judeans in Israel feared Babylonian reprisal after the Babylonian prefect, Gedaliah, was assassinated. So, they turned tail and ran away to their ally Egypt, against God's wishes (Jeremiah 40-43). An alter apikorus (elder heretic) in Israel once explained to me that this "self-imposed exile" to Egypt is the real reason for the fast of Gedaliah observed on 3 Tishrei.

Now, whoever wrote the Joseph story knew a decent amount about Egypt. It's tempting to speculate that the author was one of these second Egyptian exiles, living at the time of Jeremiah or Ezekiel. Drawing upon what he knew of Jewish folklore and Egyptian culture, this exile crafted a powerful, symbolic folk tale about resurrection and redemption, bringing hope to a people whose bones were almost entirely dry.


[Author's note: again, this material is copyrighted, please contact me before reproducing it. Thanks!]

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

More important then Egypt, and I am not looking to get incolved in your personal affairs. But how are things going with your wife ? I am interested in knowing how you cope with your in laws, and how much do they know about your life. Life is more interesting then a book written by long dead Jews that has no bearing on my life.

Another lost Jew who belongs nowhere

Lubab No More said...

Anon,
I'm hesitant to reply at the end of TheCandyMan's post (I don't want things to get off topic) but in short, things are good. I'll will make an effort to post about this next week.

http://stm.typepad.com said...

The Candyman's back, and now it's for real!

Great devar Torah.

Here is a link that might interest the Candyman:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4kR8OQCrlQ

The Candy Man said...

anon,
>Life is more interesting then a book written by long dead Jews that has no bearing on my life.

Haha, good point. You raise the question, why bother with Torah at all? Anyways, I am also interested in what's going on with LNM and his significant other.

stm,
>Great devar Torah.
Thx!

>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4kR8OQCrlQ
Kind of reminds me of my shul! Frakking Carlebachers.

DrJ said...

Does anybody notice in general how strange the last chapter (50) is, with the story of Joseph leading people to Goren Haatad, "Me'ever L'Yarden" (wherever that is), holding some kind of additional ceremony there, then the text in verse 12 suddenly reverts to saying that "his son's did so, as he commanded,... and his sons carried him to Canaan...". See the hebrew ויעשו בנין לו כן This posuk looks like a direct continuation from the final verses in chapter 49, when Yacov orders them to bury him in Canaan. Its like the whole part about Joseph's trip is inserted parenthetically. Of course there's no proof, but this seems to support Candyman's thesis about the importance of later prophecies and resurrection.

Anonymous said...

Candyman in order for there to be such intimate knowledge of Pharaoh's Egypt at the time of the exile they would have to work pretty fast. The Babylonian Exile would see the end of the 26th dynasty. The 27th dynasty would be the Persian monarchs filling in as Pharaohs. A problem though is that it is not enough to explain knowledge of Ancient Egypt but knowledge of the Egypt of the Torah.

Orthoprax said...

Candyman,

Eh, I think you're pushing it. Rising bones a theme for return by Jacob, could be. That that hints at a post Ezekiel scribe filling in details of Genesis - hardly compelling.

It's way too tenuous. If anything, you could just as well say that Ezekiel got his themed of rising bones from Genesis. But in general the connection is so thin that I don't see that it requires any explanation at all.

The Candy Man said...

drj,
I do see what you're talking about, that's an intersting observation! Never noticed that before. The story about goren ha'atad may have been brought down to explain the name of Avel Mitzrayim to the contemporary Israelite audience familiar with the place but not the history. Many such stories appear in Genesis, explaining place names. I don't know if the whole story was a "later addition." If not, then the verse "they did so, as he commanded" must refer to what is to come next in the text, although that reading is a bit forced. In any case, I do think it's significant that Jacob, too, needed to be buried in Canaan.

RG,
I agree with your reservations and like the way you're thinking. I don't know enough Egyptian history to test my hypothesis, but the next step for a research article would be to see whether details of Egypt found the Joseph story could be known to an Egyptian contemporary of Ezekiel.

orthoprax, you complain that the thesis linking Joseph's authorship to Ezekiel is tenuous. I agree, and acknowledged the inevitable chicken-and-egg problem in the post. But my main point was simply that resurrection is being used the same way in both texts, as a metaphor for national redemption. This is what "tchiyat hamaitim" originally meant.

Anonymous said...

"RG,
I agree with your reservations and like the way you're thinking. I don't know enough Egyptian history to test my hypothesis, but the next step for a research article would be to see whether details of Egypt found the Joseph story could be known to an Egyptian contemporary of Ezekiel."

Thanks for the compliment. I hesitated to point out the fly in the ointment but I am in the habit of commenting so I did.