Friday, February 29, 2008

Obama on Jewish-Black Relations

This is a crazy year for American politics. How else can you explain the following question being asked at a national debate?



This exchange is really incredible. I found it thrilling, and even a little bit embarrassing. As Jews, are we really ready for prime time? Do we deserve this moderator, himself a non-Jew, challenging Obama on our behalf? Deep down, I think this is hardly an issue that's worth national attention. Still, I was touched and thrilled to see it on national TV.

Only in America.

Obama's response was thrilling, too (the good stuff starts around 3:11 in the clip). To see him credit Jews, of all people, for such a big part of his campaign... you could tell he was speaking from the heart. I loved this statement:
... What I want to do is rebuild what I consider to be a historic relationship between the African American community and the Jewish community. I would not be sitting here were it not for a whole host of Jewish Americans who supported the civil rights movement and helped to ensure that justice was served in the South.
For Obama, who rarely talks about race, this was a very emotionally open moment. He stood up for himself beautifully, citing the challenge he made to a church full of African Americans on MLK day to confront the anti-Semitism within their midst. I for one heard him make the challenge at the time and was greatly impressed by it.

Now, Obama is not Jewish, he's black. He can challenge the African American community to do their share, but it's not his place to challenge Jews. That burden falls upon us. The vast majority of Jews are not racist -- as Obama pointed out, Jews were major supporters of civil rights. Yet in my last post about Obama, we got gems like this in the comments:
I am not a racist but I don't think a colored person can handle running this country.
There were worse things said there, too, including one person who thought he was funny to use the S word. Now, I think 99% of all Jews aren't racist, and that's to our credit. But I think it's a stretch to say that Jews, as a group, have close ties to the black community. How many close friends of yours are Jewish? Now, how many are black? Maybe what Obama is suggesting is that we try to bridge that gap. Whatever bad blood has come between us, we have had ample time to heal. If we can come together, perhaps we are not doomed to repeat the tragedies of the past. In this vein, a new Jewish-black alliance is forming in New York City.

One of the ironies of post-civil rights America is the self-segregation of racial minorities. Racism feeds upon segregation, the lack of interaction between separate groups. It's much harder to hate a group when you have good friends within that group. For Jews, interacting with non-Jews can be a struggle. Some rabbis might even say it's dangerous. But it's one of the most important things we can do. It's important for them, it's important for us, and it's important to who we are and what we are becoming. A Judaism that is 99% by-Jews for-Jews is only 1% relevant to the rest of the world. For Judaism to be sustainable, we must make it more inclusive, more relevant. We can start by reaching out to blacks, to Muslims, to non-Jews, and even to fellow Jews we have pushed away. Let's rediscover the humanism within the Judaism. Let's raise the bar in our own communities. Obama can't do it alone.

Thursday, February 28, 2008

... And This Little Piggy Humidifies the Air

Recently our crappy, heat-based humidifier died. It didn't stop working altogether but it was slowly becoming less and less effective. Plus, it was a pain to clean. It had this heating element inside that would get caked with the minerals from the water. Nazz-tastic. When I would wash it I would pull out this stuff that looked like stalagmite shavings. I would have to break chips of this mineral build-up off from the heating unit. I was glad to be rid of it.

The humidifier predated the babe so we decided to go all out and buy a new baby oriented one. A friend of ours had a cool ultrasonic humidifier shaped like a frog. Ultrasonic was important to us (me) because that would mean we (I) wouldn't be cleaning any more mineral deposits.

Mrs. Lubab went to Bed Bath & Beyond and came home with an "Adorable Penguin Ultrasonic Humidifier".

"I wanted to get the frog." she said, "but all they had left were pigs and penguins, and I definitely wasn't going to buy a pig!"

"Definitely? Why not?" I asked.

"Please. I'm not going to have a pig humidifier." she said.

I didn't push it. But, I got the impression that her reaction was religious based. It could be that she just doesn't like pigs but I think it relates to my earlier post Bringing Home Bacon (in which I talked about Chabad's efforts to keep their children away from toys depicting non-kosher animals). Maybe in normal Orthodoxy there is some sense that we should keep pigs out of our homes.

Do you think this is true?

Friday, February 22, 2008

One calf or two?

כִּי מֶה הָאָדָם, שֶׁיָּבוֹא אַחֲרֵי הַמֶּלֶךְ, אֵת אֲשֶׁר-כְּבָר, עָשׂוּהוּ

... for what can the man do that cometh after the king? even that which hath been already done.
(Ecc. 2:12)
Following up on Avi's posts, I feel like the follow-up speaker to Barack Obama. Thanks to you and your family. You have shown us that skeptics can live in peace and love with the faithful. Shelly and Avi, both of you guys see the forest for the trees.

This week's Torah portion tells the story of the golden calf. Every third grader in day school knows it well... there's something about the episode that just grabs the imagination. But this isn't the last golden calf in the Bible. The golden cherubs that adorned the Ark of the Covenant likely refer to winged bulls with human heads. And when Jeroboam is setting up the Northern kingdom of Israel, he institutes two golden calves, one in Dan and another in Beth El, at the ends of the kingdom. These are meant to replace the Temple service. Over the centuries, these calves turn into full-frontal idolatry.

Even as a day schooler, this bothered me. Why would Jeroboam specifically pick golden calves for worship of HaShem? Didn't he realize that the golden calf was, like, the biggest sin the Israelites ever committed? It just didn't make sense that he would institute another set of golden calves after the punishment the Israelites had received for it the last time, in Sinai. Would the new king really dare to use the same exact language Aaron used when promoting the Sinai golden calf? Seems like political suicide to me.

These days, I suspect the golden calf episode at Sinai never happened. My guess is it was written during the later days of the Northern kingdom, in a kind of historical-fiction cautionary tale. The prophets of those days saw how bad the calves in Dan and Beth El had become, and wrote down a metaphorical tale (or possibly a historical legend, by that time -- see Tigay on this) "forewarning" these dangers. This explains why Jeroboam never considers or mentions the Sinai Golden Calf -- that story had not been written yet. It might also help explain why the tale of the golden calf is awkwardly separated from the story of the Ten Commandments by eleven full chapters of the Hebrew Bible. The two narratives were not written together.

Of course, many other reasonable interpretations are possible, including ones consistent with a single author of the Pentateuch. We could argue about this topic all day. But the lesson of these golden calves is clear. Both Aaron and Jeroboam never meant to make an idol, but it all spun out of control very quickly. It's a slippery slope. We must be careful what we do in the name of our personal crusades, be they religious or skeptical in nature. We must strive to see the forest for the trees, and think first about who we might hurt. We must be patient and not let our fear cloud our better judgment. After all, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Thursday, February 21, 2008

My Farewell to You: Guest Post by Avi

[Today we have Avi's fourth and final post in his series. (Click to read Post 1, Post 2, and Post 3). It has been great to host Avi this week. I hope you all have enjoyed this experiment as much as I have. - LubabNoMore]

Well, I guess it's time to finish off. It has been a pleasure being a guest speaker on Lubab's blog. I will leave you with some final thoughts.

Do what makes you happy. My wife likes going to shul on Shabbos, so she does that. I stay at home and read. I walk over to shul after the davening. I stay for the kiddush, and talk to my neighbors who all know what gives, but don’t care.

I have four children who are married (happily, I hope) and successful in their professions. One of them is a scientist doing genetic research like The Candy Man. Some are more frum, some are less frum. But they are all frum to some degree. I can only hope that by the time their children are ready to get married Judaism will have moved to the middle-of-the-road. I hope no one will say "But look who their grandfather was!" as I have sometimes heard said about other people.

I am glad that all my grandchildren are Jewish. I believe very strongly in the Jewish People. Personally, I am very proud to be a Jew. We Jews add a great deal to humanity and civilization. The world would be at a great loss if not for the Jewish people. I am not talking about frum Jewish people, I am talking about any Jewish people who are not ashamed to be Jewish. Einstein never hid his Judaism and even had some sort of belief in a God.

My rebbeim in yeshiva always told me that the first question they ask you in heaven (what a ridiculous concept) is "Did you have a set time for learning?" If there is a God, I suspect that the first question he will ask me is “Avi, what do you think of the beautiful world that I created for you to enjoy?” I better have a good answer to that, because if I don’t, and there is a hell, that's where he is going to hurl me. If God went to the trouble of creating this beautiful world then I imagine he would want you to be happy on it.

The best advice I can give to you is live, love, get along with people, and follow your heart. That means that if you want to be frum, and that makes you happy, do it. Since many of you know who I am, I have included a picture of myself below. If anybody wants to talk to me, you can email me at: zerabbi@aol.com

Be happy, and make other people happy. God bless you all, or whatever powers there may be.

Avi

(right-to-left) Me, my wife, and my daughter. My son-in-law, and my three sons are camera shy. - Avi

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Why I stay with Avi: Guest Post by Avi's Wife, Shelly

[Part three of Avi's four guest posts. (Read Post 1, and Post 2 if you haven't already). Today, Avi's wife Shelly gives her take on how a skeptic and a believer can make it work. We are getting pretty meta with the guest blogging but it's interesting stuff so we will forge ahead. Also, see below for my post on tonight's total lunar eclipse. - LubabNoMore]

Everything you do, or say, or write should be said as if it's being recorded forever. Every word you say, and every gesture you make. When you live with another person that individual looks to you for validation. Hurting that person's feelings, or disrespecting that person becomes an action that you may regret at some future time. Especially, if you view it at a later time when you are more mature. Perhaps, the words mitzvah (commandment) and aveira (sin) are wrong for this crowd but, moral imperatives behoove us to tread carefully in our daily interactions.

A spouse is the person that most of us spend a great deal of time with. Therefore, since it's a mitzvah to speak respectfully to everyone, we can apply that mitzvah to one's spouse. We can extrapolate that yelling or hurting a spouse's feelings is an aveira. So, I don't yell ever. We always speak respectfully to each other.

You know I am Avi's wife and you may be wondering "Doesn't she musar (lecture) him? Or, at least yell at him when he eats pork?" Well, he does not eat treif (non-kosher), and isn't mechalel Shabbos, or Yom Tov (at least not that I have ever seen). He makes brochos (blessings) periodically (when he wants to). He is a kind man who gives charity, and he has a sensitive disposition. He is smart, funny, and cute. (Girls, he's mine). I cannot control another's thoughts. I can discuss, and direct, and I do. Sometimes he listens, and sometimes not. But, we have a life together. I believe that he is my bashert. We will be together always.

Shelly

[Tomorrow, Avi wraps things up with a post and a picture. - LNM]

Total Lunar Eclipse Tonight! *Spoiler Alert* It's NOT the Gays Fault... this time

Tonight, Wednesday February 20th, there will be a Total Lunar Eclipse over the US. Folks in Israel can see it Thursday morning Feb 21st.

Zmanim:
If you live in the EST zone the total eclipse of the Moon begins Wednesday night, February 20th, at 10:01PM and ends at 10:51PM. (For those who want to watch the whole show the partial eclipse will begin at 8:43PM and will end at 12:09AM).

In you live in Israel (Greenwich Mean Time +2, if I'm not mistaken) the total eclipse begins Thursday morning, February 21st, at 5:01AM and ends at 5:51AM. (The partial eclipse begins over Israel at 3:43AM and the eclipse will finish at 7:09AM).

All times are care of NASA Eclipse Home Page.
---
You should go out and enjoy the light show. BUT! Be warned...

According to Gemara Sukka (29a), "[t]he time of an eclipse is a bad sign for the whole entire world." And specifically, a lunar eclipse is a bad omen for the Jews. Why? Because we follow the lunar calendar, natch.

If you are wondering what could possibly make this awe-inspiring phenomenon occur keep reading. The Gemara (Talmud) explains that there are four reasons for why an eclipse a solar eclipse happens. Reason number three? Gay male sex. Apparently "Adam and Steve" are both a threat to the institution of marriage, and they can move the heavens! Luckily, this is only a lunar eclipse and was likely caused by people cutting down good trees (lunar eclipse reason #4).

Holy readers, do not worry! The Gemara gives you an out. Of course, the eclipse is a bad omen from God, and of course it was quite possibly the fault of the gays people raising forbidden animals in Israel (lunar eclipse reason #3), but as long as you are following God's commandments you are off the hook. (Close one!)

Update: Commenter "p_almonius" correctly pointed out that gay people are the cause of solar eclipses not lunar ones. I regret the error.

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

My Marriage: Guest Post by Avi

[This is the second of four guest posts from Avi. If you haven't already, read the first of the series: "My Story: Guest Post by Avi" Enjoy! - LubabNoMore]

My wife and I have a very loving and tender relationship. However, we are two completely different people. My "aishes chayil" (woman of valor), as I very often describe her, is traditionally Orthodox. She comes from a Modern Orthodox family that has leaned so far to the right that they are practically falling over. (The same goes for my relatives).

You may wonder how an atheist and a religious person can live together (and happily at that)! Being married for thirty-nine years doesn't hurt. We have a history together as well as memories.

We live a completely normal and modern lifestyle. We have two televisions, cable TV, and three computers. Motzei Shabbos (Saturday night) we usually go to the mall and take in a movie. When my wife finds it necessary to shake hands with men at a business meeting she does so with no qualms. Talk about living in two different worlds.

Anyway, as I mentioned yesterday, God never told me to do anything. Whatever I was told was said by other men who were supposedly smarter then I was. Perhaps my wife is the smart one. Her philosophy is "This is what I was taught, this is what I do." Although she is a very educated woman, and lives in the modern world, she has an almost childlike innocence, and trust in HaShem (God). As you well know, we are in a recession. When I mentioned to her that my income was seriously down she said “maybe if you went to shul on Yom Kippur and davened (prayed) it would improve.”

At some point my wife must have realized that I was not frum anymore. I stopped going to shul, and she started going every Shabbos. I did not put on tefillin, and stopped washing my hands for bread unless we had company, or were guests at someone’s house for lunch. It's quite easy to practice Judaism without believing. You just go through the motions.

I never do anything to be mechalel Shabbos (violate the Sabbath) that she can see. She stopped looking at the thermostat on Shabbos because she saw that the numbers were changing (she certainly did not touch it). She started talking to me. “Was everything OK?” “What was I thinking about?” I admitted to her what my feelings were. At first, there were some hurt feelings. I told her that just because two people are married does not mean that they both have to think alike. I guess that after awhile she accepted the fact that I was not the person she married, or the person that she thought that I was. Much to her credit our life together did not suffer in any way. My wife really is an amazing person, and much smarter than I am. We talked, and talked, and as long as she was sure that I still loved her, and sure that I would not attempt to bring any drastic changes into our life, she was OK with it.

At home certain things are expected of me. They are terms I can well live with. I must make Kiddush (blessing over wine) on Friday night, and at Shabbos lunch, and of course I also make havdalah. I always wear a kippah (that's no problem), and of course I can't be mechalel Shabbos. Again, terms that I can well live with. She still would like me to put on tefillin, even periodically. I told her that that was a possibility. Put ‘em on, make the brocho (blessing), maybe say Shema, and take them off.

We respect each other greatly and never cross certain boundaries. I never make fun of my wife. (I used to until she hit me over the head with a frying pan). I say "If this makes you happy, that's fine with me."

Sometimes on Sunday we go into Brooklyn to visit relatives. When we are ready to leave the house, coat on, keys in hand, she reminds herself that she did not yet daven mincha (afternoon prayers) and if she waits it may be too late to pray later. So, here I am, ready to go, and she starts davening. It can be annoying after awhile. But, in respect for her belief, I wait patiently without saying anything.

Many of the people that I have met who live in the frum world meld in with whatever the wife wants to do. Some men go to shul with their wives and just hang around. Others sit in the shul and daydream. You can make me go but you can’t make me daven. Some men go to a different shul from the one their wives go to. Me? I don’t go at all except for the kiddush (social get-together following services).

My wife davens twice a day. She also says tehillim (psalms) for many sick people, as well as for me. Whether I should see reality as she believes it is not the important thing. She feels good saying it. The words to her are like poetry, or maybe a love song to a great God who she believes very strongly in.

Tomorrow my wife will write a brief post so that you can get some insight into her point of view.

Monday, February 18, 2008

My Story: Guest Post by Avi

[For the next few days I will be hosting a series of guest posts by commenter Avi. I find Avi's story interesting, and in many ways familiar. I may not see eye-to-eye with him on every issue but I am happy to give him a forum to tell his piece. Finally, please note, I've edited Avi's text and take responsibility in advance if I've misrepresented Avi's position or story. - LubabNoMore]

I am Avi. Some of you probably know me. I am at best an agnostic, and at worst an atheist. It depends on the day and the week. However, I was not always an atheist.

My story is simple. I was raised as an Orthodox Jew. For many years I practiced Orthodox Judaism but, always with a doubt in back of my mind. Growing up as a kid I did the typical things that guys do. I skipped putting on tefillin at times. I didn’t have any feelings of guilt about it. (Goodness knows that Jewish kids have enough guilt trips laid upon them by their Jewish mothers). I went to an Orthodox Yeshiva through high school, and for a smidgen of Bais Medrish. I got smicha. (Though how, I will never know). But, even way back then I felt the stirrings of disbelief. My Rav gave up on me. He said "Just keep on learning and you will come to understand it." I did “keep on learning” and grew to understand that I really did not believe any of it.

I think I may have never really believed any of it. As a young man in yeshiva I already started having my doubts. There were just too many things that my eyes and mind could not believe. For example, there were all the stories in the Torah that were never explained to my satisfaction. Rashi made even less sense.

I remember many years ago in Yeshiva Torah Vadaas there was an old Rabbi who would stand in the hallway and hand us paper towels when we washed for lunch. I still remember his words "Whatever you do in life, whether you become a doctor, or a lawyer, or an engineer, learning Torah will make you more successful." I didn't believe it then and I believe it less now.

I returned to religion when my parents passed away. I felt an obligation to say kaddish for them. (I now understand it was more for me than for them). Despite my disbelief I said kaddish faithfully. I also tried to daven with some semblance of kavanah (intent). I was going to shul periodically even before they passed away. For the requisite eleven months I said kaddish. After I finished I kept going to shul for awhile longer, but then it all fell apart. My mind could not accept the idea of a creator who was watching everything I did and was going to reward me in heaven (a Christian concept) for my good deeds and punish me for my bad deeds. Especially without a book of rules telling me what I was expected to do. The Torah talks about all kinds of weird things but it makes us guess at (or wait for a Rabbi to explain) what it is we are supposed to do. Nowhere does it say that davening is to be done three times a day. Yet we spend hours a day doing this practice that is nowhere required.

I must add that partially, my faith dissolved because I am a scientist at heart. I like to look at everything through the prism of evidence. If I see no evidence of something I find it difficult to accept. I am a voracious reader and can watch the science shows for hours. After awhile I believed in science and the amazing things scientists have discovered. What have the Talmudists discovered? They've discovered more chumras (stringencies) for the slow witted, and the firm believers, who were never allowed to think for themselves.

The computer generation opened wide my eyes and mind. I read the blogs by XGH and Ben Avuyah. Many of the things that they said made a lot of sense to me. I already had some friends who were skeptics. They pointed out other people who were also skeptical of Judaism. I think skeptical thought is what the people in Lakewood and Williamsburg are more afraid of then anything else. They say that the internet is assur (forbidden) in order to keep kids away from pornography. But, I suspect it's to keep them away from anyone who can think independently of what the Rabbis permit them to think.

Most people in my shul know what I think. To tell the truth, I don't think anyone cares what you believe as long as you don't do something blatantly heretical. Two years ago I was having a discussion with the Rabbi during the Yom Kippur break. I admitted to him that I did not believe in Torah min HaShomayim (Torah from heaven). He didn't say anything. I figured he must think the worst of me. Nonetheless, before Neilah (the final Yom Kippur service) he asked me to open the aron kodesh (holy ark). This is an honor that most men vie for. This honor is supposedly a segulah (action that brings good luck) for parnossah (livelihood). It didn't work.

Usually, I find that the women are the frum ones and the men not. My wife sees G-d in everything that happens. I see Him nowhere. Tomorrow, I will write about how my wife and I make our relationship work.

Saturday, February 16, 2008

Stern Student Calls for DH Class

Over Shabbos I read an editorial in The Observer by Olivia Wiznitzer. In the editorial (The Examined Life: Academic Bible at Stern) Olivia (who seems to go by Chana in the comments) argues for a class on DH to be taught at Stern.

I relate to her opening paragraph (even thought I don't agree with her on every point):
There are two sorts of people in the world. There are those who live examined lives, searching and questing, eagerly reaching to find some sort of meaning. These are the kind of people who cannot lie to themselves; who would prefer the truth, even if it breaks them, even if it terrifies them. These people experience the tremendous grandeur of the problems in religion, all of that which is compelling and worrisome. They are the sort who must know things, who cannot deny themselves knowledge. They are curious and interested in everything around them, in every path to insight.


After Shabbos I went to the website and read some of the comments on the editorial. Some are interesting and others are somewhat predictable.

Here's an excerpt from a comment by a user who goes by "jackie":
Call me intellectually dishonest for asking, but is the Orthodox populace better off if we're all familiar with the DH? ...
I'm not into the idea of intellectual free-for-all, that as long as you're being intellectually honest, it doesn't matter what you conclude. Since I have a mesora, my epistemological plane precludes me from that kind of ideology.
Very sad.

Friday, February 15, 2008

Do not stand idly by


[The Candy Man on shul security - LNM]

Working in the lab in a research university means working late many nights. On Wednesday, as I left the lab around 9 PM, I passed a young woman, possibly a student, talking on a cell phone in the stairwell. It was completely dark outside. Leaving the building, I saw a dirty-looking, bearded man heading towards the building and poking his head in the trash cans outside. He proceeded to move gruffly towards the stairway exit and hang out around there. I knew that young woman could exit right at that spot at any moment. As I walked away, I turned and asked, "What are you looking for?" He looked surprised, and responded, "I don't know." I didn't want to fight the guy, so I kept moving, but I kept an eye on him. If he hadn't walked away from the building after a few minutes, I'd have called the campus police.

This isn't "Courtrooms of the Mind." We can't give these guys the benefit of the doubt here. This guy was probably nuts, potentially dangerous, and our campus is not secure at all. It bothers me. We've had so many shootings lately in America. We've had three this week, for god's sake. Five were killed at the Kirkwood city council meeting on February 7. Another two were murdered at Louisiana Tech the following day. And yesterday, February 14, five were slain at Northern Illinois University. The Virginia Tech massacre, when 32 innocents were killed for nothing, occurred almost a year ago. And what has changed?

All these deaths were preventable, and Jews are the ones who know how to do it best. After all, lunatics have been trying to kill our innocent civilians in Israel for decades. Prevention is highly successful -- about 10 out of every 11 attacks is foiled. This is because they have a security guard at every mall entrance and in front of every big building. These guys have a wand they use to check if you are packing heat before you walk through that door. Sometimes, the security guards have to give their lives to save the people inside, but it works.
It wasn't always like this. I remember the days before the security guards, when crowded Tel Aviv nightclubs and Jerusalem street markets were being blown up on a regular basis. The security guards, and other measures, improved prevention success from 30% in 2001 to almost 90% in 2004 (a beautiful statistical analysis is publicly available at http://www.mideastweb.org/log/archives/00000298.htm).

It shocks me that you can walk onto the NY subway without getting waved down. That public buildings in the US are completely unprotected. That campuses and high school buildings, which are proven targets, are unchanged 10 months after Virginia Tech. It seems that since 9/11 the big response of the American government to "beef up security" in public places is to put up signs in the subway asking riders to be vigilant and report suspicious packages. In the meantime, they spend hundreds of Congress hours debating whether Bonds and Clemens are using steroids (clue to Congress: they are!). George Mitchell, yes the guy who came up with the Mitchell plan for Middle East peace, is now heading up the steroids investigation. Well, this is a waste of precious time and resources. Where is the Mitchell plan to prevent gun rampages?

There's no need to put very strict gun control laws into effect. That would just spin off another huge debate about whether these measures work. There is a sizeable community in this country that loves owning guns, and we want to work with them, not fight them. Instead, let's do something simple: start employing more security guards, with public funds, in malls, campuses, stadiums, and public transportation systems. Yes, it will cost money. Yes, it's worth it. In fact, we need more jobs like this in the USA. We are heading for a recession, and manufacturing jobs have all disappeared to China. When FDR faced the Great Depression, he countered it with job creation... be it building highways or managing national parks. Security guard jobs cannot be offshored. They just have to be created.

What works in Israel may not work exactly in America. Palestinian suicide bombers are a specific type of threat, and counter-intelligence (some provided by concerned Palestinian informants) has helped a lot in addition to security guards. So yes, it will take some thought to figure out exactly how to secure America's internal borders from the nut jobs who would use their Second Amendment rights to kill their fellow citizens. However, I do think that more can be done, and it's time we started demanding it from our public officials. As Jews, who have dealt with this before, it's our duty to step up to the plate and show them the way. Start by signing the petition: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/Beef-Up-Security

Thursday, February 14, 2008

The Official God FAQ

Not a whole lot to write this week. But here's a link to "The Official God FAQ".

Enjoy.




Next week: Guest posts by Avi

Friday, February 8, 2008

A Higher Purpose

[Notes from the campaign trail, courtesy of the Candyman. -LNM]

The last few weeks have been some of the most whirlwind and intense of my life. I have been campaigning for Barack Obama in my home state of California. I am not a politician, but I've felt for a long time that Obama was special. His themes of unity and peacemaking appeal to me. It's a message we've all heard before, so simple, so powerful, yet somehow so difficult for us to achieve. I've never heard a politician speak that way before. So when I was presented with the opportunity to volunteer for his campaign in a leadership role, I took it. After all, these opportunities don't come along every day.

I've met so many people over the last few weeks. Bob, a soft-spoken, retired gentleman whose house became our neighborhood Obama headquarters, filled with volunteers on cell phones. JD, a videographer who decided to devote all his tape to the Obama campaign. Blake, a student at the local theological school and part-time Obama for America coordinator, who gave a rousing speech about the meaning of a grass-roots campaign. And so many others. These folks were inspired, and they inspired me. We became a diverse coalition, people of all ages, all races, united under the banner of unity itself.



The experience has changed me. For the first time since my early days in yeshiva, I feel like I'm part of something greater. It's like a wind at my back, pushing me forward with a greater purpose. It sends chills down my spine, just walking around town. I wonder if this is what the prophets felt like, when they were bursting with the word of God.

It has made me think about some of the conversations we've had in this space, conversations about priorities. I have long lamented the fact that Jews spend most of their spiritual time interacting with other Jews. I have opined that our time would be better spent serving the general community, even at the cost of religious services. The latter suggestion met with strong opposition from some readers of this blog. Some of them even challenged me to put my money where my mouth was. Why spend your time blogging? Surely there must be better ways to help the community, better ways to spend your time.

Reflecting on the Obama campaign, I am wondering whether perhaps I got it wrong. You see, different things will move different people. For me, it is the politics of hope that send chills down my spine. For others, it is a rousing chant of L'cha Dodi on Friday evening. And that's OK. That's spiritual. That's wonderful. If you enjoy it, if you find meaning in it, if this is what moves you, then by all means do not give that up. There's no right answer here, and it's not my place to judge how you spend your time. On the contrary: chase that feeling down, immerse yourself in it, delve into it, wrestle with it, follow it to its core. It's what works for you.

That being said, life is long. And you may find, as did I, that your priorities change over time. As Adyashanti once put it, the spiritual tools that work for you at one time in your life may not work at another time. If that happens, do not be afraid to cast yourself upon the river and see where the current takes you. Do not be afraid to experiment, to change. You see, change does not mean that what went before was wrong or stupid or useless or meaningless. Life is a development. Change does not incriminate the past, but rather elevates it into something relevant and important. In realigning ourselves with our own internal compass, we return meaning to our lives. We resurrect the dead within ourselves, and turn our sins into merits. So however you choose spend your spiritual time, I encourage you to continuously seek out experiences that send a chill down your spine. That give you the sense of something greater. For random globs of cells like us, there is really little more we can ask out of life.


Thursday, February 7, 2008

Random Globs of Cells?

"...are we characters in a dubious fairy tale written thousands of years ago in the depths of human ignorance? Or, random globs of cells who got a little luckier than $%#@ that grows on our shower tiles?" - Jon Stewart on The Daily Show

Humanity has a track record of being self-centered. For millennia we considered ourselves, and Earth, to be the literal center of the universe. We almost can't help our obsession with ourselves. And quite frankly, our self-centeredness almost seems like a reasonable position for humanity to take. After all, we haven't met any other life-forms. The closest we've come to touching another planet is our few short trips to the moon.

The question "why am I here?" seems to be a natural thing people ask. It's almost pre-programed into our brains. We want to be important. We clearly feel the need to have a purpose. But, just because we feel like we should have a purpose doesn't mean we actually have one. Aside from our insecurities and sense of self-importance why should we think we are any more special than the molecules on any other planet?

Tuesday, February 5, 2008

The Truth is Out There

As far as I can tell god doesn't exist. As far as I can tell aliens don't exist either but I don't rule out the possibility. There is a contradiction here but only because I haven't defined my terms.

Let me clarify exactly what I mean. I don't believe that extra-terrestrials are visiting Earth and, more importantly, I don't think aliens are abducting humans and probing their nether regions. But, I do think it is certainly possible that intelligent life exists on another planet in another galaxy.

Basically, I don't believe that aliens exist as described by Area 51 conspiracy theorists. But, if reasonable evidence of alien life were presented to me I would probably accept it.

With God/s I can't know for certain if He/She/They exist. However, I am certain that "the God who brought you out of Egypt" as described by the Torah and the Sages does not exist. The evidence (archaeological and otherwise) indicates that the Torah was not written by Moshe and that the Hebrews (as described by the Torah and most of Navi) didn't exist.

Basically, I don't believe in god as described by Orthodox Judaism. But, if reasonable evidence of a god or gods was presented to me I would probably accept it.

-
The truth is I am more open to the idea of alien life. Why? Because humans exist. Call us a "proof of concept" test. People, animals, and bacteria exist on this planet so life is evidently possible. If you factor in the number of galaxies in the universe (billions!) there seems to be plenty of opportunity for life to emerge elsewhere. It seems reasonable to think that life may exist on other planets.

On the other hand, God has no such parallel.

Based on what we know it would seem alien life is significantly more likely than God. What do you think?

Friday, February 1, 2008

An open letter to the Orthodox Union

[A post from the files of The CandyMan. -LNM]

As a public servant, I am committed to stem cell research as a means of saving lives. However, I have always opposed to the destruction of human embryos for this purpose. Every embryo has a soul, and that life is worth just as much as any other. Even when my mentor urged me to give up this position, I stood my ground. I always expected my friends on the religious right to back me up. It is very disappointing to me that the Orthodox Union has sided with Congress and come out in favor of destroying human embryos for research. I am not a Jew, but I am a born-again Christian, and we share a common Biblical tradition. With all due respect, I think you guys might have made a slight error in understanding what the Old Testament says about destroying embryos. I understand the passage is a little unclear, so I figured I'd bring it up for discussion and explain my take on it. Here's how it goes (Exodus 21):
כב וְכִי-יִנָּצוּ אֲנָשִׁים, וְנָגְפוּ אִשָּׁה הָרָה וְיָצְאוּ יְלָדֶיהָ, וְלֹא יִהְיֶה אָסוֹן--עָנוֹשׁ יֵעָנֵשׁ, כַּאֲשֶׁר יָשִׁית עָלָיו בַּעַל הָאִשָּׁה, וְנָתַן, בִּפְלִלִים. כג וְאִם-אָסוֹן, יִהְיֶה--וְנָתַתָּה נֶפֶשׁ, תַּחַת נָפֶשׁ.

22 And if men strive together, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart, and it not be ASON, he shall be surely fined, according as the woman's husband shall lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. 23 But if it be ASON, then thou shalt give life for life.
Now, the tricky part is the part about it not being ASON. What does that word mean? Well, I cycled through about twenty different translations at BibleGateway.com, which is where I like to go for inspiration. They all had different writing styles, but they all said that "ASON" means either "injury follows" or "serious injury" or "mischief follows" or something to that effect. They seemed to say the issue was whether the pregnant mother got hurt or not. But y'see, the funny thing is, none of these explanations made any sense to me. If the whole case is about the mommy, why make it so complicated and involve a miscarriage and two men fighting and all that? So I called up an old buddy of mine, kid who likes to call himself the Candyman. He's a strange bird, that Candyman, always memorizing Bible during college when the rest of us were out doing God knows what. Anyhoo, old Candy set me straight about the passage with one word. He said, the word ASON in that passage just means "intentional harm." Let's take a look at that passage again, with the Candyman's translation:
22 And if men strive together, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart, and it not be intentional harm, he shall be surely fined, according as the woman's husband shall lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. 23 But if it be intentional harm, then thou shalt give life for life.
Now that's an explanation that even this simple rancher from Texas can understand. The issue in the passage is whether causing a miscarriage is punishable by execution. The part about the two men fighting was just an example of how another person could be injured by accident. The Bible lays down the law: if you cause a miscarriage by accident, then you gotta pay a fine... but if you cause a miscarriage on purpose, well, it's a life for a life. So, rabbis of the Orthodox Union, I have a proposal for you. It seems there has been some confusion about this passage in the past. I hope you'll take a few minutes to reexamine this passage and study it carefully. Consider the Candyman's interpretation, and decide for yourselves whether it makes more or less sense than the ones on BibleGateway.com. If it makes more sense, then I urge you guys to take God's charge seriously and withdraw your support for research on human embryos. After all, that's murder. Instead, consider making a donation to a Snowflake organization. Because all life is precious, it is Divine, even embryonic life. I know, because it says so in the Bible.
Sincerely,
President Bush.